Social inclusion includes active inclusion and passive inclusion. For drug addicts, active inclusion is a challenge to the weaknesses of human nature, which is associated with Chinese people’s deep-rooted bad habits of keeping up appearances and inferiority complex.
Why aren’t they socially acceptable? This is due to their reduction and absence of core social moral or spiritual values. China’s traditional culture is broad and profound, as we taking “yin” and “yang”, the two opposing principles in nature in thinking. For example, we regard the opposite transformation of “yin” and “yang” as truth, the mutual complementation of “yin” and “yang” as goodness, and the harmonious unity of “yin” and “yang” as beauty. Similarly, our society is going through promotive development with truth, goodness and beauty. As it is mentioned above, if we consider drug rehabilitation as opposite behavior of drug addicts, such behavior should have been accepted as good deeds. If we consider drug addicts as the “evil” of a society, we should accept the evil which is a harmonious unity with the good. Just like the moon waxing and waning, the society also has its good or evil, the difference is to whose benefit the social governance would tend. In the diversified social development, the harmonious degree of society is reflected by the profit and loss ratio of good and evil.
In my opinion, one thing difficult for narcotics control is to regulate the profit and loss ratio of good and evil, and then to find out a path to “social inclusion”.
'Sister House' case urges efforts in combating corruption in affordable housing