Newsletter
Weather
Community
English home Forum Photo Gallery Features Newsletter Archive   About US Help Site Map
China
World
Opinion
Business
Sci-Edu
Culture/Life
Sports
Photos
 Services
- Newsletter
- Online Community
- China Biz Info
- News Archive
- Feedback
- Voices of Readers
- Weather Forecast
 RSS Feeds
- China 
- Business 
- World 
- Sci-Edu 
- Culture/Life 
- Sports 
- Photos 
- Most Popular 
- FM Briefings 
 Search
 About China
- China at a glance
- China in brief 2004
- Chinese history
- Constitution
- Laws & regulations
- CPC & state organs
- Ethnic minorities
- Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping

Home >> World
UPDATED: 08:59, August 18, 2006
White House defends eavesdropping program
font size    

The White House issued a strong- worded statement on Thursday, defending the warrantless eavesdropping program as "firmly grounded in law," hours after a federal judge ruled the program unconstitutional and ordered its immediate halt.

"We couldn't disagree more with this ruling, and the Justice Department will seek an immediate stay of the opinion and appeal," the statement said.

Earlier Thursday, U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor ruled in Detroit, Michigan, that the Bush administration's warrantless eavesdropping program run by the National Security Agency (NSA) was unconstitutional.

Taylor, the first judge to rule against the program since its disclosure last December, said the program violated the separation of powers doctrine, the Administrative Procedures Act, the constitution, and the law governing domestic wiretapping.

In its statement, the White House said the program was " carefully administered, and only targets international phone calls coming into or out of the United States where one of the parties on the call is a suspected al Qaida or affiliated terrorist."

The whole point of the program, the statement said, was to " detect and prevent terrorist attacks before they can be carried out" and that it was the president "most solemn duty to ensure their protection."

Describing the program as "one of our most critical and effective tools in the war against terrorism," the statement said the parties concerned had agreed that enforcement of the ruling would be stayed, until the court would conduct a hearing scheduled for Sept. 7 on the ruling.

The Justice Department, calling the program "a critical tool" to detect and prevent a terrorist attacks in the anti-terrorism war, said it would appeal the ruling.

In a statement, the department said the president had the primary duty under the constitution to protect the American people, and that the constitution gave the president the "full authority necessary to carry out that solemn duty, and we believe the program is lawful and protects civil liberties."

The lawsuit was filed in January by the American Civil Liberties Union, on behalf of some journalists, scholars and lawyers who said many of their overseas contacts might be targeted by the program and that made their work difficult.

Shortly after the program's disclosure, Bush acknowledged that he had authorized the NSA to eavesdrop, without court warrants, on international calls and international e-mails of people suspected of having links to terrorists when one party to the communication was in the United States.

A law, the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, makes it illegal to spy on U.S. citizens in the United States without warrants issued by a secret court.

The revelation of the program created a political debate in Washington, and congressional hearings have been held to investigate its legality.

Source: Xinhua


Comments on the story Comment on the story Recommend to friends Tell a friend Print friendly Version Print friendly format Save to disk Save this


   Recommendation
- Text Version
- RSS Feeds
- China Forum
- Newsletter
- People's Comment
- Most Popular
 Related News
Dic

Manufacturers, Exporters, Wholesalers - Global trade starts here.
Copyright by People's Daily Online, all rights reserved