Newsletter
Weather
Community
English home Forum Photo Gallery Features Newsletter Archive   About US Help Site Map
China
World
Opinion
Business
Sci-Edu
Culture/Life
Sports
Photos
 Services
- Newsletter
- Online Community
- China Biz Info
- News Archive
- Feedback
- Voices of Readers
- Weather Forecast
 RSS Feeds
- China 
- Business 
- World 
- Sci-Edu 
- Culture/Life 
- Sports 
- Photos 
- Most Popular 
- FM Briefings 
 Search
 About China
- China at a glance
- China in brief 2004
- Chinese history
- Constitution
- Laws & regulations
- CPC & state organs
- Ethnic minorities
- Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping

Home >> Sci-Edu
UPDATED: 08:12, August 25, 2006
Roundup: Pluto demoted after definition of planet
font size    

The resolution of a planet definition, the first of its kind in the astronomical history, was adopted in Prague Thursday after days of fierce debate and effectively kicked Pluto out of the planet group in the solar system.

According to the new rules for a planet adopted at an International Astronomical Union meeting in Prague, Pluto doesn't make the grade for a planet: "a celestial body that is in orbit around the sun, has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a ... nearly round shape, and has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit."

Pluto is automatically disqualified because its oblong orbit overlaps with Neptune's. Instead, it was defined as a "dwarf planet", but no longer a planet.

Ron Eckers, President of the IAU, which is the world's largest astronomical society, said it may not matter that much how many planets are there in the solar system.

"What really matters is that we have a definition of planet, and with that, we can move on with our studies," he told Xinhua.

The definition, which Ecker described as "carefully refined" with much compromise after considerable discussion, came in line with the contemporary observation that has been changing the understanding of planetary system.

According to the resolution, Pluto, Charon, Ceres and 2003 UB313 are termed "dwarf planets," despite having enough mass and being nearly round.

Still, Ecker, who is strongly in favor of naming the eight planets found before 1900 "classical planets", and including "dwarf planet" into category of "planet", call the result "a pity."

If a larger category of "planet" is created, we can leave open the possibility to discover and define other types of planets, he said.

Fang Cheng, an astronomer with the Chinese Academy of Sciences, also vice chairman of the IAU, told Xinhua that the definition is "clear and compact."

Source:Xinhua


Comments on the story Comment on the story Recommend to friends Tell a friend Print friendly Version Print friendly format Save to disk Save this


   Recommendation
- Text Version
- RSS Feeds
- China Forum
- Newsletter
- People's Comment
- Most Popular
 Related News
- Small Pluto, a planet or not?

- How many neighbours does the Earth have?

- Is there a 10th planet in the solar system?

Dic

Manufacturers, Exporters, Wholesalers - Global trade starts here.
Copyright by People's Daily Online, all rights reserved