A battle over global warming between environmental groups and 12 states that favor regulating greenhouse gases and the U.S. government's Environmental Protection Agency, 10 states and groups that represent industries that produce the gas will be argued before the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

Plaintiffs in the case, which is known as Massachusetts v. EPA, claim the EPA's mandate to shield Americans from harmful pollution includes putting limits on car, truck and power plant emissions that have been shown to hasten climate change.

But the EPA, along with 10 states, four motor vehicle trade associations and two coalitions of utility companies and other industries maintain the agency lacks the authority to limit emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.

The dispute is centered around whether or not greenhouse gases fit within the federal Clean Air Act's definition of a pollutant. If they do, the plaintiffs argue the EPA has the authority to regulate them.

Greenhouse gases occur naturally and are also emitted by cars, trucks and factories into the atmosphere. They can trap heat close to Earth's surface like the glass walls of a greenhouse.

This case is not a debate about whether these emissions are linked to global warming. The Bush administration, and in fact President Bush himself, have acknowledged this link, and Bush told a summit of industrialized nations this year that human activities play a role in world climate change.

The question is whether the U.S. government has the power to cap these emissions. Industry groups argue it doesn't, and carbon dioxide is a naturally occurring gas that does not fit the U.S. Clean Air Act's definition of a pollutant.

The Bush administration has consistently rejected capping greenhouse gas emissions as bad for business and U.S. workers.

In his first year as president in 2001, Bush withdrew from the Kyoto Protocol, an international agreement aimed at cutting greenhouse gases by setting limits on emissions from industrialized nations.

Plaintiffs in the case are Massachusetts, California, Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington State; the cities of Washington D.C., New York and Baltimore; the government of American Samoa; and 13 environmental groups.

Those arguing against putting limits on greenhouse gas emissions are the EPA, Michigan, Texas, Idaho, North Dakota, Utah, South Dakota, Alaska, Kansas, Nebraska, Ohio and numerous industry groups, including the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, which represents nine carmakers including the so-called "Big Three."

Source:Xinhua/Agencies