Text Version
RSS Feeds
Newsletter
Home Forum Photos Features Newsletter Archive Employment
About US Help Site Map
SEARCH   About US FAQ Site Map Site News
  SERVICES
  -Text Version
  -RSS Feeds
  -Newsletter
  -News Archive
  -Give us feedback
  -Voices of Readers
  -Online community
  -China Biz info
  What's new
Bill for more troop reduction in Iraq runs around in U.S. Senate
+ -
08:46, September 22, 2007

 Related News
 Democrats' proposal to adjust troop combat tour suffers setback
 Roundup: Egyptian experts predict long-term U.S. military presence in Iraq
 Experts propose cutting U.S. troops in Iraq by half
 US troops could leave Iraq in one year
 Deadliest days for US troops in Iraq
 Comment  Tell A Friend
 Print Format  Save Article
A bill that would order most U. S. troops out of Iraq in nine months was blocked in the Senate on Friday, the third defeat of Democrats to change the government war policy this week.

By voting 47 to 47, the Senate cut off the debate the bill sponsored by Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin.

The bill needs 60 votes, two-thirds of the Senate seats, to be passed.

"We're going to continue to lose lives and squander resources while they (the Iraqis) dawdle," Levin said after vote.

Republican Senators blocked the bill, alleging that large size of troops withdrawal in short time would leave Iraq, which just gained "progressive" tendency in improving political and security situation, back to the hands of al-Qaida terrorists, and put Americans under more attack threats.

Earlier this month, Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. military commander in Iraq, recommended to Congress and President George W. Bush that some 130,000 troops be kept there through mid of 2008.

Currently, a total of 165,000 troops deployed in Iraq after a surge earlier this year.

"If we leave, we will be back - in Iraq and elsewhere - in many more desperate fights to protect our security and at an even greater cost in American lives and treasure," said Sen. John McCain, a presidential candidate and the top Republican on the Armed Services Committee.

Congressional Democrats have suffered a setback on Thursday as a bill aiming at reducing fund for most Iraqi combat operations by next June was blocked.

The bill, which only allows to fund very limited U.S. mission such as training Iraqi forces or targeted counter-terrorism operation, was backed by merely 28 Senators, all Democrats, including presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

Another bill, which was seen as the most hopeful anti-war proposal to gain enough support in the Senate, was also blocked due to inadequate votes on Wednesday.

The bill requires that troops in Iraq be allowed as much time at home as they do deployed, instead of 15 months in combat and 12 months home Army soldiers spend now.

"Countless Republicans have said the right things back in their home states: That we must support our troops, that we must protect our national security, that we must change course in Iraq. But here in Washington, they have consistently voted the wrong way," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said in Senate on Thursday.

"Back home they assert their independence, but in Washington they walk in lockstep with the President and continue to support his failed policies."

Source: Xinhua



  Your Message:   Most Commented:
Discussion: China dealing with climate change
Chinese president leaves for Australia
Guest Say: The art of recovering real life on the land
China, Japan vow to enhance defense cooperation

|About Peopledaily.com.cn | Advertise on site | Contact us | Site map | Job offer|
Copyright by People's Daily Online, All Rights Reserved

http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90777/6268616.pdf