China has surpassed the US to become the world's largest recipient of foreign direct investment in the first six months of the year, as disclosed by the United Nations Conference of Trade and Development.
But how long will the nation maintain its top ranking? The sputtering global economy helped China capture the prominent position. Xinhua quotes Zhan Xiaoning, director of UNCTAD Division of Investment and Enterprise, as saying, "it's mainly due to a 39.2 percent fall in FDI flows to the US, compared to a three percent decline in China."
Accordingly, some Western economists and journalists might dismiss China's top ranking for FDI as just lucky and argue the US would regain its number one status soon.
UNCTAD already hinted that, "early indications show that FDI flows to the US might be stronger in the second half of 2012." The US will probably return to lead in the rankings, but the real question should be, how long before China outranks the US for attracting foreign investments on a consistent basis?
It may depend on whether the US pursues isolationist trade policies or endorses a pro-growth open consumer market that welcomes imports along with foreign investments.
In their campaigns, US presidential candidates – GOP nominee Mitt Romney and President Barack Obama – talked tough about China, but in their third and final debate, they softened their stances against the country. Romney said he wishes to avoid a trade war, but would still insist on pushing for a higher-valued Chinese RMB currency.
Both countries would enjoy better cooperation, as they grow richer together. However, we cannot assume that relations between the two countries will be perfect, but there will be a common understanding to avoid a trade war.
Perhaps, the fight for top ranking for global FDI for both countries might transform into a spectators' sport. Just like watching a basketball game between two teams, with players and coaches that are equally talented and motivated.
Using this analogy may seem irrelevant, but too often political, diplomatic and economic competition has become too intense and bitter. Both sides should reduce simmering tensions and accept each other as equal but different countries. The saying, "winning isn't everything, it's the only thing," should not be the primary focus.
Anyway, the China vs US foreign investments challenge would remain a closely contested match.
According to Global Investment Trends Monitor, "in the first six months of the year, China attracted $59.1 billion in FDI, while the US attracted $57.4 billion." That's a difference of less than $2 billion.
News we recommend:
"Made in China":Charming the World
"Made in China":A Boon for the Masses
"Made in China":A Blessing for Businesses
"Made in China":The Bitter Blessing
Shanghai's 'other' market
China's tourism industry reaps golden harvest
Commentary:Asking the right questions
More Investment, More Woes?
All that glitters is gold