Latest News:  
Beijing   Light to moderate rain/Light rain    13 / 8 ℃  City Forecast

English>>Foreign Affairs

Cross-province patrol begins in South China Sea

By WANG QIAN  (China Daily)

08:23, November 09, 2012

5-day mission seeks to strengthen region's maritime law enforcement

China is strengthening its offshore law enforcement capacity, with three provinces and one autonomous region launching their first joint patrol in the South China Sea on Wednesday.

The five-day patrol fleet consists of ships from the maritime safety administrations of Guangxi, Guangdong, Fujian and Hainan. Haixun 31, one of China's largest patrol ships, is also part of the fleet.

An official surnamed Song from the Maritime Safety Administration said the cross-province patrol will become a regular occurrence to enhance the offshore supervision capacity, but revealed no details about future patrol plans.

At present, the Maritime Safety Administration will arrange two or three patrols in the South China Sea aimed at preventing illegal activities including discharging excessive pollutants into the sea.

Shen Chunsheng, deputy director of the Guangxi Maritime Safety Administration, said the joint patrol is expected to travel nearly 1,000 km to detect pollution discharged by ships.

The joint patrol will strengthen law enforcement capacity in the South China Sea to guarantee maritime safety, Shen added.

It is the latest move the country has taken to strengthen supervision of the South China Sea.

On Tuesday, the State Council approved a marine zoning plan for the southern provinces of Guangdong and Hainan before 2020, emphasizing offshore law enforcement capacity in both plans.

President Hu Jintao emphasized that the country's maritime interests should be strongly protected, as he opened the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China on Thursday.

China is preparing itself to deal with complicated marine disputes.

On July 24, Sansha city, Hainan province, the country's newest city, was established on Yongxing Island to administer the Xisha, Zhongsha and Nansha islands and their surrounding waters.


【1】 【2】

Most viewed commentaries
Most viewed commentaries
China is no military threat despite commissioning of aircraft carrier Overseas Chinese's participation in politics becomes irresistible trend China’s path to democracy
Will U.S. security defense deployment make Asia safe? Why the 18th CPC National Congress attracts global attention Cancellation of Japan-U.S. joint drill does not mean showing weakness


Email|Print|Comments(Editor:姚春、张茜)

Leave your comment2 comments

  1. Name

U thant at 2012-11-11180.192.55.*
They must learn to obey international law and respect other nations !
wende at 2012-11-0998.109.105.*
China should arm these vessels with light weapons in case of conflict and they should be protected covertly
  

Selections for you


  1. China's stealth fighter concept model

  2. PLA Macao Garrison finishes 13th rotation

  3. Unforgettable moments in Nov. (III)

  4. Flight test of unmanned aircrafts conducted

  5. First inter-blood-type liver transplant in China

  6. Harbin Autumn Automobile Exhibition

  7. Embroider best wishes on insoles in Shanxi

  8. China's rich people will reach to 280 million

Most Popular

Opinions

  1. Commentary: Hot money needs cooling
  2. Smart solutions for better city, better life
  3. China remains an 'engine' in global economy
  4. M&A of listed companies gaining steam
  5. Is 'culture' inferior to 'commercialization'?
  6. Chinese liquor makers "sober up" over bans
  7. Strength of Chinese culture lies in understanding
  8. Securing China's e-commerce growth
  9. Hammered ore prices threaten Chinese iron miners
  10. CNN Beijing chief: China's challenges, opportunities

What’s happening in China

Landmark building should respect the public's feeling

  1. Herders, sheep flock move to winter pasture
  2. First inter-blood-type liver transplant in China
  3. HIV patient to sue hospital over cancer op refusal
  4. Test in intelligent vehicle for food detection
  5. Smart card, dumb refund rules